More on social networking for servers

Very often the discipline of documentation does not come naturally to systems administrators. When it comes to  aspects like relationship data, this is not immediately obvious to them, and the benefits of capturing and sharing that data is probably a little esoteric. This means that without a direct and immediate benefit to them, getting SA’s to input this data is going to be a chore.

The social networking paradigm would mean that entering data is a little more fun and interesting than filling the forms you see in most configuration management databases. Hopefully this would be an added motivator to keep data up to date.

Social Networking for Servers

In my last post I extolled the virtues of mapping relationships between configuration items. As I was thinking about this more, it came to me that there are many similarities between this and social networking. In both we map and track relationships and in both we use these relationships to derive value and aggregate information.

In my mind the social networking product that best fits the analog is Facebook. You create a profile for yourself, you build up a network of relationships, and you have a stream of status information. Your friends aggregate this status information to form a single news feed about all the people they care about.

So in terms of a configuration management equivalent, we have a profile for each server, application and service in our data center. We then link them together with relationships. I would add more information with these links like what type of link it is. Because servers don’t have the same privacy concerns we do, then I would have the page in the profile that shows the relationships map recursively as far as they can up and down the pyramid stating who is related to what and how. Each item that is mentioned should be hyper-linked to their own profile page for easy navigation.

The “Wall” as it were can be an aggregation of status messages from the incident/problem/change ticketing system, and maybe other areas like the network monitoring and performance monitoring tools that may be deployed. I think it would be really cool for system administrators to be able to reference items in a micro-blogging environment which then magically appear on the wall.

Why Relationships Mater

No I am not talking about human relationships – although they matter too. I am talking about configuration management. Let me explain.

First of let me clarify configuration management. I am not talking about enforcing standard server builds and standard software configurations. I am talking about getting all the stuff in your data center in a database and being able to use that information. This is more like the ITIL view of configuration management.

The ITIL standard states that you should keep records of all “configuration items”, accurate details about them and also data like relationships between CIs and change history.

The first part just sounds like simple asset management to me and once your data center has grown to a certain size, then you are probably pretty good at that. It seems to me that the next level is relationship mapping and I am pretty sure that is where you get the most bang for your buck when it comes to ITIL CMDBs.

To illustrate my point, lets build a word picture of how a set of relationships might look:

  • server 1 runs application A
  • application A provides the authentication service
  • server 2 runs application B
  • application B uses application A
  • application B provides the website service.

Now this is a very simple set of relationships and already we can draw some very useful insights:

  1. If the authentication service goes down, then the website breaks too.
  2. By looking just at the service items, we see the start of a service catalog. Not only that, it is easy to see the key assets needed to run this service.
  3. We can see the impact of issues like performance problems in the authentication service.
  4. We can perform impact analysis for change requests to any of these items.
  5. In the event of a disaster, we can see what order things need to be restored. In fact if we have time estimates for the restoration process of each of these items, we have the start of a project plan.

Immediately, we can see that there is huge value to relationship data. This is why it matters and why it is worth maintaining this data. Once this data is being collected, maintained and used, then in my mind that is a big milestone towards transitioning your systems team from an asset centric operations oriented shop to a more service oriented, and hence customer focused endeavor.